Mr. Böhm, your professional career has taken you halfway around the world. What were the stations that had a particular impact on you?
After training as a forwarding agent, I was drawn abroad early on - first to England, then to Hong Kong and Korea. During this time, I mainly worked in the air and sea freight sector. I later returned to Germany via Italy, where I worked for many years as Managing Director of a logistics company. Today I am an independent consultant - with the aim of passing on my experience and supporting companies in the logistics sector.
What is the current situation on the sea freight market: is calm returning or will it remain turbulent?
It is currently more stable than immediately after the pandemic, but there can be no talk of real calm. Political tensions, trade conflicts and new regulations continue to cause major fluctuations. Due to the attacks on merchant ships by Houthi rebels, many shipping companies are avoiding passage through the Suez Canal. The ships are being rerouted via South Africa. This extends transportation times, which is a major challenge, especially for perishable goods such as food. It also drives up costs.
Can you give us specific figures?
Before the crisis, the Red Sea handled around 30 percent of global container traffic. At the beginning of 2025, 85 to 90 percent of ships were already bypassing the route through the Red Sea and sailing along the Cape of Good Hope instead - with up to 20 days longer transit time and around USD 1 million in additional fuel costs per trip.
Uncertainty is also coming from the USA at the moment. Can you feel this in the market?
Absolutely. Many decisions are completely unpredictable, especially under Donald Trump. Tariffs of up to 70 percent are imposed virtually overnight - the goods are often already on their way. And if the framework conditions change in the middle of the water, containers have to be turned back or rerouted. This is not only logistically complex, but also extremely expensive - especially if the affected container is at the bottom of the stack and all the others have to be lifted down first.
How predictable are international supply chains at the moment?
Supply chains are more predictable than during the pandemic, but we are still a long way from real stability. Flexibility, real-time transparency and alternative route planning are key requirements in supply chain management today. Companies that rely on close-knit digital monitoring can react faster and manage risks better. Port logistics in particular make it very difficult to plan the supply chain. There are major capacity bottlenecks in hinterland connections. There is a lack of drivers as well as special equipment such as gensets*. The outflow by rail is also regularly negatively affected by track disruptions or rail construction work.
Have prices stabilized in the meantime?
Not really - there are still significant fluctuations, especially on Asia-Europe routes. Political tensions, for example in the Middle East or Ukraine, have an impact, as do new regulations, seasonal effects, capacity bottlenecks, the behavior of large shipping companies, strikes, as recently seen in northern European ports, and the CO₂ levy. Added to this are rising costs due to technical requirements - for example, the use of lower-emission fuels. The changeover is expensive and in many cases hardly economically feasible. Just one figure: Before the pandemic, the container price from Shanghai to the northern European main ports, for example, averaged USD 1,400 per 20-foot standard container (TEU). Today, it is around 20 percent higher.
How interested are your customers in climate-friendly or CO₂-neutral logistics?
Sustainability is becoming massively more important and the pressure is growing noticeably: customers are demanding CO₂ information in their offers and sustainability is becoming a competitive factor. Freight tenders are no longer judged solely on the lowest prices for the best service, but also on the lowest emissions. But as soon as it comes to money, the reality becomes apparent - if the green provider is more expensive, the cheaper option is often chosen anyway. In the end, it's the price that counts for many, not the environmental footprint. One major problem is customer loyalty: Many are demanding green fleets with LNG propulsion - but when gas prices exploded during the energy crisis, hardly anyone was prepared to bear the additional costs. Many haulage companies had to park their gas-powered vehicles. Nevertheless, there are promising approaches: In the Netherlands, for example, the first low-emission container ship is in operation - financed jointly by the freight forwarder and the customer. It will not work without such partnerships in the future.
Do you see any further progress in alternative drives?
Yes, especially with LNG drives. The use of methanol and the first concepts for hydrogen-based drives are gaining in importance. The inland port operator Moerdijk Container Terminal (NL) has inland vessels with electric drives in circulation for its barge route to Rotterdam. Wind power is also being discussed again as a complementary technology, for example in the form of rotor sails. However, many of these technologies are still in their infancy or are limited to certain ship classes.
What role does digitalization play in the industry?
A central one. Without digital processes, the industry would collapse today. Track & trace, automated processes, digital interfaces - this is the only way to cope with the immense volume despite the lack of personnel. Nevertheless, there is still room for improvement, for example in the end-to-end integration of customs and document processes. Ports such as Rotterdam and Antwerp have a very efficient digital platform that enables efficient planning of port and hinterland logistics.
How do you assess the future viability of the Port of Hamburg?
Hamburg remains a central hub, but the challenges are great. The hinterland connection is patchy, and waiting times of 40 to 60 hours are not uncommon. Although Hamburg has caught up in terms of digitalization, it still lags behind Rotterdam and Antwerp. This impacts on costs and increases the pressure in international competition.
Can Wilhelmshaven be an alternative?
The potential is there, but the reality is lagging behind. There is a lack of infrastructure and connections. If the port had been located closer to the major economic centers, more would have been possible. As it is, Wilhelmshaven remains a complementary location, but not a serious replacement for Hamburg, Rotterdam or Antwerp.
What do you see as the most pressing problems in the industry?
Clearly: the shortage of skilled workers. In regions such as Munich or Stuttgart, it is almost impossible to find sufficiently qualified staff. At the same time, regulatory complexity is increasing - for example due to the so-called "Kassel Act". This refers to stricter EU rules on cabotage*. In my opinion, we need to change or abolish cabotage regulations and finally allow transport companies from the Baltic or south-eastern European countries to operate freely in Hamburg, Antwerp or Rotterdam. In the past, foreign drivers could take on several transports within Germany. Today, a maximum of three journeys in seven days are permitted - after which a break of several days must be taken. This makes planning much more complex and makes transportation noticeably more expensive.
Are there any bright spots, i.e. real showcase projects in the industry?
Yes, but many are still in the pilot phase. There are initial approaches to avoiding empty runs - for example through more intelligent container handling. Alternative drive systems in inland shipping are also making progress. But one thing is clear: without customers who join in and invest, much will remain piecemeal. Service providers cannot manage the transformation on their own.
*Gensets = Abbreviation for generator set - i.e. an engine that drives a generator and provides power for refrigerated containers during transportation, for example, if no external power source is available.
**Cabotage = transportation of goods within a country by foreign transport companies.
About the person: Olaf Böhm
Olaf Böhm is a trained forwarding agent and has almost 35 years of experience in international logistics management. His career has taken him through various European markets - including the UK and Italy - and to Asia, in particular Hong Kong and South Korea, over almost two decades. In 2012, Böhm took over the management of a Munich-based logistics company with a focus on food logistics as part of a succession plan. One year later, he became a partner. During his eleven years in management, he played a key role in the organic expansion of the company from two to eleven locations in eight countries - with sales growth from around 80 to almost 300 million euros. Olaf Böhm sold his shares at the end of 2023. Today, he supports companies as a consultant in strategic growth and transformation processes - with a particular focus on logistics, supply chain management and international markets. His company is based in Aßling near Munich. Further information: www.bo-log-consulting.com